Oregon Oregon Tort Reform 2004 --- Capping Liability Damages, Punishing Consumers
The Oregon Trial Lawyers retained HCI to help
defeat Ballot Measure 35, which would have amended the constitution to establish a $500,000 cap on non-economic damages in medical liability cases. The ballot measure lost by 50.53% to 49.47%.
The failed effort to pass the ballot measure was funded by healthcare providers within and outside of Oregon. HCI has long been committed to enhancing quality of care and patient safety as the solution to curbing preventable plaintiffs' injuries, deaths, and subsequent litigation. Our independent analysis of medical malpractice insurance premium increases links them to cyclical and erratic investment returns and poor portfolio management, not frivolous lawsuits.
HCI's role in the successful effort to preserve unconstrained patients' jury awards was to provide consultation, information, and research input to trial lawyers campaign management.
Fraud,
Unmonitored Service Vendors Characterize Health Plans
A
city government with almost 27,000 healthcare plan beneficiaries
had been paying provider bills through its TPA, which among
other problems, failed to monitor submitted claims properly
and received kickbacks from the PBM on a per RX basis. The
MCO was raising premiums double digits annually and would
not disclose critical cost and provider contract information
to our client. It was apparent that relationships among the
various service vendors were so rife with conflicts-of-interest
that controlling costs and monitoring the quality of services
were secondary considerations.
HCI
provided our client with more than 50 substantive recommendations
for changing the infrastructure of its healthcare benefits
plan and ensuring optimum control and accountability. Realistic
savings will accrue in the 18-21% range of its healthcare
expenditures, which exceed $50 million annually.
Rising
Employee Benefits Costs and Low Morale